Services like Revver or Metacafe, on the other hand, who pay users for their content, do have a problem. Users who cheat the system into believing more people watched their videos, could steal a lot of money from them. For these services, it’s not the n
There are lot of ways to catch cheaters: * Do the views come from the same subscriber? * Did views skyrocket in a certain period with a steady instead of random growth rate? * Did a user view more videos in a period than possible? * Is the ratio of views/
The number of video-embeds on MySpace grew on average 57% between the months of September and October, yet MySpace Videos grew a whopping 93.27%. Nearly twice as many MySpace videos were found on users’ pages. With everyone talking about YouTube these d
The normal ratio for reviews to viewership is about 1:100 but many videos that rank highly for the day, are 1:3 or 1:2. In our casual observation, this seems to happen most in the morning, when we speculate that people are battling each other, jockeying f
Metacafe (if your video is featured). I’m still making very decent money when they feature my videos. Dig the new logo. Google Video (slow and steady increases over time… a video never seems to die there) Yahoo Video (better than YouTube, and if they
YouTube hat zwar den meisten Traffic aber auch die meisten Videos deshalb ist es schwierig sich dort abzuheben und gesehen zu werden. Außerdem ist das Popularitätsprinzip problematisch. Bei Google Video gibt es mehr Views.
