-
he sudden rush of company failures could be, as some people have suggested, because 2007 is the show-me year for startups which raised money from 2005 on. Though that's no doubt true, I do wonder whether some ventures have closed down quietly in the last
-
So while the marquee deals are few and far between, paying amateurs is a pretty easy way to attract attention, creators… and perhaps even the next big thing. Revver15 has gained fame along with talents such as lonelygirl15, Ask a Ninja, and Ze Frank for
-
So we’ve launched a hack of the advertising system to try to raise funds for CC a bit differently. This is a new CC video (3 minutes). It’s been Revverized — meaning at the end is an ad. When people watch the video through to the ad, we get paid.
-
ViTrue, an Atlanta-based startup which provides technology to enable user-generated advertising campaigns, has received funding from Comcast Interactive Capital and Turner Broadcasting
-
The duo are now serving their videos at EepyBirdy Google Video with a Coke promo and hyperlink. Presumably they’ve cut a handsome deal with Coke (I’m guessing it approaches six figures since they made at least $50K on Revver from the first experiments
-
The answer to this question - the marginal benefit of paying peers - isn't straightforward.peers play vastly different roles in all these value chains. Understanding the new value chain, how value is created - and who requires the ability to capture a sha
-
Curious about how people’s Revver income was impacted by the 1.0 release. Up, down, flat? Mine is significantly lower than before the launch, but I also went through a period where I couldn’t figure out how to upload new videos
-
In fact, it seems that this may be Revver’s new role: making money for content creators once they’ve achieved success over on YouTube.
-
So, our ad revenue minus bandwidth expenses reached $1,393.38. That translates into about $3.85 per thousand hits. Revver, only pays out about 0.75 per thousand,12 haben mehr als $25 erhalten.
-
Die Produzenten haben knapp $30 000 gemacht mit dem Mentos Coke video. Mentos hat alle Werbeplätze im Anschluss gekauft. Das Video wurde über 5 Mio mal gesehen und Revver hat mittlerweile gute Werbepartner.
-
Viele Modelle streiten darum Erfolg zu haben. Werbung am Ende (Revver), Seitenwerbung (Eeoff), Lulu.tv (Pro Accounts, die in abhängigkeit Geld zurück bekommen). Und Natürlich eine Menge Promotiondeals.
-
Der Cola Mentos Clip wurde 2,5 Millionen mal bei Revver gesehen und hat dadurch Werbeeinnahmen in Höhe von $30 000 generiert. Die Hälfte geht an die Produzenten, die den Film für ca. $300 erstellt haben.
-
Erklärung warum Revver nicht so gut funktioniert wie YouTube. Im Prinzip wollen die leute eher die Befriedigung der Berühmtheit und des Buzz sowie schnelles Publizieren. Sie nehmen an dass die Werbeinnahmen nur marginal sind und setzten auf andere Fakto
