-
Digg traffic in particular is less like networking with like-minded individuals at a social event and more like getting attacked by a pack of wild dogs, who leave nothing of value in their wake, other than lessons learned on closing comments and crashed s
-
As we all know I'm no longer working on Netscape. So, these are my observations as someone who is no longer affiliated with the service. I've figured out exactly how you can get almost any quality story on the home page instantly.
-
There’s nothing unexpected or inherently bad about this — we just need to remember how quickly “social” can become “commercial” and managing the “community” can become managing the “marketplace.”Companies charge as much as $15,000 to g
-
My attention was recently brought to this post on Digg.com which made it to the Digg front-page with only 1 Digg. When users started to question how a story with one Digg could make it to the front-page, the following conversation with Kevin Rose ensued:
-
Social media sites continue to change the way we interact with data but expect more activity and content shaping in the future from marketers targeting the social media space for a quick link injection.Opportunists will continue to jump into new networks
-
All of this points to a real problem in the social media world. The only yardsticks we use to measure the trustworthiness of a source are purely based on popularity - e.g. in-bound links, votes, etc. Now often popularity and quality are closely aligned. H
-
he challenge for media companies is to find the right balance between participation and control, outsourcing and editorial guidance, openness and order. The walls between content creation and commerce are also falling away, as we’ve seen with everyth
-
Spike the Vote works on a point system. Each day I give you a mission with several stories to Digg. 20% of your mission involves digging stories submitted by users in this community, while 80% of of your mission is completely random. This is to eliminate
-
User/Submitter users are then given the chance to digg your submission and other stories for $0.50. After your submission has reached your desired number of diggs, you will be emailed a report.
-
Where Digg Submitters Pay for Digg Users to Promote their Stories. And, Where Digg Users Make Easy Money.
-
This algorithm update will look at the unique digging diversity of the individuals digging the story. Users that follow a gaming pattern will have less promotion weight.Außerdem werden die User anders bewertet Digger und Submitter.
-
power law Distributionskurve gliedert sich in die Bereiche Big Head, Fat Belly und Long Tail. Bei Digg lässt sich das schön sehen, weil zwar die Top-Storys von wenigen gemacht werden aber die Masse der Votes auf den Fat-Belly entfällt.
-
Interessante Gedanken zur Kontroversen ob die Social Dienste ihre Topuser zahlen sollten oder nicht. Digg lehnt das Kategorisch ab. Besonders interessant auch die Frage ob ein Hive Mind immer so interelligent ist wie er gemacht wird.
-
# top 10 users contributed 1792 i.e 29.8% # top 100 contributed 3324 stories i.e 55.28% Und 66% der Fronsteiten Storys kommen von 0,03% der Digg User.
