There’s nothing unexpected or inherently bad about this — we just need to remember how quickly “social” can become “commercial” and managing the “community” can become managing the “marketplace.”Companies charge as much as $15,000 to g
All of this points to a real problem in the social media world. The only yardsticks we use to measure the trustworthiness of a source are purely based on popularity - e.g. in-bound links, votes, etc. Now often popularity and quality are closely aligned. H
he challenge for media companies is to find the right balance between participation and control, outsourcing and editorial guidance, openness and order. The walls between content creation and commerce are also falling away, as we’ve seen with everyth
Digg Klon für Mediendateien. PopCurrent is a new, democratic way for the people to decide what media becomes popular. The rank of a particular media link rises and falls on the front page depending on how may people vote for it -- or against it.
The company’s model for advertising is a throwback to the 1950s, when sponsors were named in advance of shows by the hosts. The hosts talk up the products and sometimes joke about them—even going so far as to poke fun at them.
power law Distributionskurve gliedert sich in die Bereiche Big Head, Fat Belly und Long Tail. Bei Digg lässt sich das schön sehen, weil zwar die Top-Storys von wenigen gemacht werden aber die Masse der Votes auf den Fat-Belly entfällt.
Interessante Gedanken zur Kontroversen ob die Social Dienste ihre Topuser zahlen sollten oder nicht. Digg lehnt das Kategorisch ab. Besonders interessant auch die Frage ob ein Hive Mind immer so interelligent ist wie er gemacht wird.
Für wen es gefährlich werden könnte, wenn die User bezahlt werden. Digg usw. Für die alten Medien ist es gefährlich weil die Preise sinken, für die neuen gefährlich weil sie bisher einen free ride hatten und umsonst inhalte geliefert bekamen.
