Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /www/htdocs/w0061f0a/gugelproductions.de/links/services/bookmarkservice.php on line 8

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /www/htdocs/w0061f0a/gugelproductions.de/links/services/templateservice.php on line 8

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /www/htdocs/w0061f0a/gugelproductions.de/links/services/templateservice.php on line 19

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /www/htdocs/w0061f0a/gugelproductions.de/links/services/userservice.php on line 8

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /www/htdocs/w0061f0a/gugelproductions.de/links/services/cacheservice.php on line 10

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /www/htdocs/w0061f0a/gugelproductions.de/links/services/tagservice.php on line 9

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /www/htdocs/w0061f0a/gugelproductions.de/links/services/bookmarkservice.php:8) in /www/htdocs/w0061f0a/gugelproductions.de/links/templates/top.inc.php on line 1
bertram: web2.0 + money | Video links | Digitaler Film

bertram: web2.0 + money

Sort by: Date / Title / URL

  1. The Next Net: Eyeballing the Value of Web 2.0 Startups

    That's why I like the slide below created by eSnips CEO Yael Elish.  It gives an approximate value for many high-profile Web 2.0 sites by correlating publicly available Alexa Web traffic numbers with the value of known deals like YouTube's.  This slide
    24.05.2007 to , , , , ,
  2. The Next Net: 2006 Web 2.0 Fundings Doubled to $844 million

    Venture capitalists poured $844 million into Web 2.0 startups last year, according to Ernst & Young and Dow Jones VentureOne.  That's double the $406 million they invested in 2005, and up from the nadir of Web 2.0 investing in 2002, when they put in just
    24.05.2007 to , , , , ,
  3. GigaOM » Free: a Tactic, not a Business Model

    scaling from $5 to $50 million is not the toughest part of a new venture - it’s getting your users to pay you anything at all. The biggest gap in any venture is that between a service that is free and one that costs a penny.
    17.05.2007 to , , , , ,
  4. (PDF) he Figures Behind Web Apps

    Wieviel kostet es DropSend: $48,012 FreshBooks: $20,000 Maya’s Mom: $70,000 Mobissimo: $60,000 Wesabe: $200,000
  5. A VC: Web 2.0 Is A Gift, Not A Threat, To VCs

    Venture capital still plays an important role in financing web entrepreneurs. But the need for capital comes later in the company formation process. And that is a very good thing for everyone involved. Because VCs can scale their capital (ie risk) exposu
  6. CTV_Web2 0Study-FINAL.pdf

    venture firms have put a total of $455.5 million into 79 Web 2.0 deals. That's twice the amount invested during the same period a year earlier. a study released earlier this month by Dow Jones
  7. VentureBeat » VC investments in Web 2.0 companies booming, better study shows

    Venture capital investments into “Web 2.0″ Internet companies this year are on track to double last year’s levels to about $500 million, according to a new report on the bubbling sector. The report shows investors pumped $263 million into Web 2.0 co
  8. Article - Money - Whither Web 2.0?

    "With $10,000 to $15,000, you can start a Web 2.0 company," Krishnan said. "If your site is compelling enough, you'll get users. And if you get users, Google is watching."
    28.10.2006 to , , , , ,
  9. Publishing 2.0 » Web 2.0 Feels Good, But Where’s the BUSINESS MODEL?

    The market here has moved faster and along a more unusual path (community-driven companies) than competitors could respond, so we’re confusing a short-term market dislocation with a trend toward “purpose-driven” companies.
  10. Traction | Union Square Ventures

    We have two rules: 1 - don't invest in consumer facing web services without any consumers using them 2 - there is an exception to every rule
    15.10.2006 to , , , , ,
  11. VC Invesment in Web 2.0 On Track For $500M This Year: Report | paidContent.org

    a business model that revolves around a dynamic interface facilitating participation through such methods as user-created content, networking, and collaboration. Applications used include podcasting, tagging, blogs, social networking, mashups, and wikis
    27.09.2006 to , , , , ,
  12. BuzzMachine » Guardian column: The bubble

    And so it struck me that the most long-lasting, most self-delusional bubble of all was the one that protected monopoly newspapers in America for the last 50 years, since television did them the favour of killing their print competitors.
  13. No day without thrill and challenge! - Musings on how to do the VC Round

    7 Tips dazu wie man eine VC Runde am besten übersteht bzw dazu wie man sich eni VC für sein Unternehmen aussucht.
    05.09.2006 to , , , ,
  14. VC Ratings: Kiko failure deemed a harbinger of things to come for Web 2.0 startups

    Scoble: "There are simply too many companies chasing too few users." The important thing is to develop a feature in a unique and defensible way at just the time there is a real need for it in the market.
  15. Feld Thoughts: Q&A: VC Economics - Web 2.0

    Antwort auf die Frage ob VC eher auf das schnelle Geld und den schnellen Exit zielen oder ob sie eher auf die lange Möglichkeit und die große Firma setzten. Prinzipielle geht es nicht allein um den zu erzielenden Gewinn, denn das Risiko muss mit einbezo
    07.08.2006 to , , ,
  16. SiliconBeat: The venture capitalist's Web 2.0 list

    Eine liste mit den VC Summen. Die Unternehmen die 2005 und im 1. Quartal VC erhalten haben sind auf der Liste enthalten. Es soll eine Web2.0 Finanzierungsliste sein.

First / Previous / Next / Last / Page 1 of 1