Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /www/htdocs/w0061f0a/gugelproductions.de/links/services/bookmarkservice.php on line 8

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /www/htdocs/w0061f0a/gugelproductions.de/links/services/templateservice.php on line 8

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /www/htdocs/w0061f0a/gugelproductions.de/links/services/templateservice.php on line 19

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /www/htdocs/w0061f0a/gugelproductions.de/links/services/userservice.php on line 8

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /www/htdocs/w0061f0a/gugelproductions.de/links/services/cacheservice.php on line 10

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /www/htdocs/w0061f0a/gugelproductions.de/links/services/tagservice.php on line 9

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /www/htdocs/w0061f0a/gugelproductions.de/links/services/bookmarkservice.php:8) in /www/htdocs/w0061f0a/gugelproductions.de/links/templates/top.inc.php on line 1
bertram: business + sharing | Video links | Digitaler Film

bertram: business + sharing

Sort by: Date / Title / URL

  1. Blinkx AdHoc

    Make money every time you share a video on your blog, website or social networking profile. Sound good to you? It's easy to do! Our clever technology matches relevant, in-video text ads to any video. Whenever someone clicks on an ad in your video, you mak
  2. weblog.wanhoff.de » AGBs von Videoportalen

    Sevenload bietet seine Dienste ausschließlich für private, nicht gewerbliche Zwecke an. Mit Registrierung verpflichtet sich jeder Nutzer, die Dienste nur für private Zwecke zu nutzen.
  3. NewTeeVee » Magnify.net Raises $1.2 Million

    Magnify.net1, the self-serve white-label web video service we covered2 earlier this month, has closed a $1.2 million round of funding.
  4. Bolt.com Sold To GoFish For $30 Million; Settlement With UMG; Will Pay “Several Million Dollars”

    The company, in an effort to bring up money for this, has sold itself to video search and aggregation site GoFish, for about $30 million in stock (GoFish is traded on OTC board). UMG sued video sharing sites Grouper and Bolt.com for allowing users to swa
  5. HandHeld Entertainment Acquires Putfile.com and Increases Audience to More Than 13.7 Million Unique Visitors and 83 Million Page Views

    HandHeld Entertainment™ (NASDAQ: ZVUE, ZVUEW) today announced it has acquired Putfile.com™, a leading free digital media service featuring user-generated content for approximately $7.1 million ($1.08 million in cash and approximat
  6. RO v. RW environments

    RO means the primary use intended is “read only” — the content is offered for the purpose of consumption; there’s no invitation to add content back, or to modify the content offered. RW means the primary use intended is “read/write” — the c
  7. Video Sharing Site vMix Gets Second Round Funding

    vMix, a video sharing and tools site, has received an undisclosed amount of funding in its second round. The round was led by Mission Ventures and Enterprise Partners Venture Capital. This is a funny line from the company’s release:
  8. Gifting technologies: A BitTorrent case study

    We determine features associated with high levels of gifting and suggest changes to the protocol and to the design of associated BitTorrent Web sites to promote it. We then extend our conclusions and suggestions to gifting technologies in general.
  9. Weedshare.com: Play, buy and share music. Free song downloads.

    Play. Buy. Share. Play Weed files free, then buy them and share them any way you like. Put Weed files on your blog or Web site, or use P2P or e-mail. When Weed files sell, the artist makes money and so do you.
  10. Beet.TV: Guba is "Farthest Along" In Monetizing Independently Produced Videos, Exec Says

    Guba has built a successful platform to download full-length films, as noted in our first post with Bart Myers. The company enjoys the cooperation of major film studios. And, it appears to have figured out digital rights management issues.
  11. Internet Video - How To Monetize Your Independent Video Content - Robin Good's Latest News

    While none of the services listed promise to make you a movie millionaire overnight, the possibilities for monetizing your online video productions have multiplied in a very short space of time, and continue to do so. Using one, or indeed several, of the
  12. Google shares ad wealth with videographers | CNET News.com

    Google has begun sharing advertising revenue with the makers of a popular video clip in a groundbreaking deal that could drive up the costs of competing in the fledgling video-sharing sector.
  13. Reality Digital: YouTube for Businesses

    Crudely put, Reality Digital enables businesses to set up their own branded YouTube. Reality Digital is a video production and sharing platform, designed for businesses - an example is the website for the popular CBS tv show Survivor, which uses the Real
  14. Dirk Ströer investiert in Sevenload. FTD

    Ströers Beteiligungsgesellschaft erwirbt eine Beteiligung. Ingesamt wird Sevenload jetzt bereits mit 130 Mio Euro bewertet. Sevenload peilt nach Zahlen von Unternehmensinsidern 2008 rund 30 Mio. Euro Umsatz und einen Gewinn von 10 Mio. an.
  15. Sites that Pay for Web Video: From CinemaTech

    I've tried to list all of the Web sites that enable video producers to make money from their work. I've ranked the sites subjectively, based on how much traffic and buzz they've been attracting, and also how likely it seems that a video producer would act
  16. Revver Income Since 1.0 Launch « Will Video for Food

    Curious about how people’s Revver income was impacted by the 1.0 release. Up, down, flat? Mine is significantly lower than before the launch, but I also went through a period where I couldn’t figure out how to upload new videos
  17. YouTube vs. MySpace?

    The main point of potential conflict is the millions of YouTube videos that are embedded on the profiles of MySpace users. The revenue-sharing question for MySpace and YouTube is really tough, but it has to be resolved
  18. YouTube: Why The Fun is Officially Over - Mashable!

    I’m not against commercialization, but I have noticed YouTube becoming much more noisy over recent weeks. What’s changed is that the video site has become a major attractor of eyeballs, and eyeballs equal attention, fame and money.
  19. Time Warner, big media and video sites - Blog Maverick

    1. Take the money, promotion and revenue share.2. Keep your content exclusively for your own site and let users access and post content from there.3. Do a cross licensing deal with other content rights owners.
  20. Internetvideo-Boom in Deutschland?! Telepolis

    Der fünfte Teil unserer Artikelserie. Es werden die deutschen Videohoster vorgestellt und die aktuellen Probleme und Lösungsansäzte diskutiert. Natürlich gibt es auch einen schönen Ausblick auf die Zukunft der Internetvideos in Deutschland.
  21. Why Online Video Sites Are Hot Targets

    Videoegg Zuschauer sind das doppelte Wert, weil sie häufiger auf Werbung klicken. A smaller audience may be more valuable than a big one, if the small one does the sorts of things that advertisers like—such as clicking on ads, buying products, or visit
  22. Can YouTube Grow Up And Stay Cool? - Forbes.com

    YouTube has offered other labels an option for an equity stake in the company as part of proposed deals. If Warner took YouTube up on such an offer, it could create an expensive precedent for every other copyright holder YouTube wants to settle with.
  23. GigaOM » VideoEgg Lays on Ad Network

    VideoEgg isn’t a CDN itself (it uses Akamai) but it coordinates video for a growing group of online social networks and tools, including AOL, Bebo, Current TV, Dogster, hi5, Tagged, and Six Apart, delivering up to 20 million streams per day.
  24. Lonelygirl15 Moves from YouTube to Revver? - Mashable!

    In fact, it seems that this may be Revver’s new role: making money for content creators once they’ve achieved success over on YouTube.
  25. The Coming Dramatic Decline of Youtube - Blog Maverick

    2 Probleme. 1. reine Hostingseite, die die Traffickosten übernimmt und 2. hauptsächlich Copyrighted Material. Unmöglich das den Usern zu erklären und zu einfach für andere (Copyrightinhaber) um den dienst nachzumachen.
  26. YouTube yearly revenue potential: Fred says $150M a year, I say $20M. - The Jason Calacanis Weblog

    If I was a video holder I would go to YouTube and say you can have all our stuff for an $8 CPM and you keep all the upside and we want an upfront, non-refundable advance of $3M a year.
  27. Research Note: Show Me the Money Markets, Networks, and Communities

    You should see Heavy and YouTube as opposites in strategic error. Heavy doesn't create enough value consistently enough to be able to exert enough pressure to capture a significant share. YouTube, on the other hand, is creating a great deal of value - but
  28. Who Will Make Money with User-Generated Online Video? » Publishing 2.0

    I think the real winners long-term will be platforms that enable a new generation of content producers to break free from the old media content hierarchy and make money from their creativity. As Umair reminds us, it’s all about enabling creativity.
  29. YouTube: Waiting For The Payoff

    Traffic Kosten: Current estimates range from $900,000 to $1.5 million per month. YouTube muss mehr aus den User Generated Content machen und versuchen die Videos besser zu Filtern und einzuteilen um Platz für Werbung zu schaffen.
  30. A VC: YouTube's Potential Revenue

    Ein Denkmodell, bei einem CPM vom $15 und 80% verwertbarer Inhalte könnte YouTube einen Umsatz von $440 Mio erzielen. Bei einem 65/35 Split bleiben ca. 150 Mio gewinn für YouTube. Problem: Zahlen sind zu hoch angesetzt.
  31. The Digital TV Weblog: YouTube: Don't Blame Me If You Produce Crap

    If the owners at YouTube followed the traditional script, they would adopt the pre-roll model, float an IPO, cash out and then move on to the next opportunity a whole lot richer.
  32. Die Videohoster suchen nach Antworten

    Ist der dritte Teil unserer Artikelserie auf Telepolis. Im Artikel werden die Geschäftsmodelle der Videohoster beleuchtet und existierende Probleme aufgezeit sowie mögliche Lösungsansätze.
  33. Metacafe - Producer Rewards

    Metacafe will pay you $5 for every thousand views your video gets on our site. Ausgezahlt wird ab 20 000 Views = $100. With well over 1 million unique users per day watching over 450 million videos every month
  34. Metacafe: Will Show Butt Crack for Food « Will Video for Food

    I made $800 in a few days by simply showing the world my butt crack. Metacafe is paying $5 per 1,000 views. Wenn Metacafe ein Video featured erhält der Produzent $5 pro 1000 Views. Bei Revver ist es mehr aber es ist ein Anfang.
  35. YouTube could be a steal at $1 billion | CNET News.com

    YouTube is a time bomb and a gold mine waiting to happen. The question is which one will be bigger. Grouper hatte 1% Marktanteil, deshalb könnte YouTube $1Mrd wert sein. Aber es ist absolut nicht klar ob sich das GEschäft lohnt.
  36. Sony buys Web video site Grouper | Top Business News | Reuters.com

    Sony Corp.'s entertainment unit said it had agreed to pay $65 million to buy Web video-watching site Grouper.com, marking the growing embrace of the user-generated video craze by big media.
  37. Will Video for Food » What Will YouTube Do When Paris Hilton Doesn’t Save Them?

    YouTube needs to maintain “consumer generated content” to keep people returning to the site and avoid being dissintermediated by large content owners. the amateur video content is the only edge YouTube has over Big Media.
  38. gründerszene » Interview Ibo von Sevenload

    Sehr ausführliches Interview mit dem Sevenload Gründer Ibrahim Evsan. Es geht um die Gründungshürden, den Sevenload start, die Konkurrenz, das Innovationskonzept und die Zukunft, den letzten Erfolgreichen Monat usw.
  39. CEO: YouTube Is Generating “Significant Revenues” | paidContent.org

    Hurley avoided specifics about plans for making money, according to the San Francisco Chronicle, but talked a bit about advertising, saying the company is looking more at promoting brands instead of video pre-rolls or search-targeted advertising.
  40. Feature: Why YouTube is about to die

    Einige Gründe warum es YouTube bald nicht mehr Geben wird. Neu die Topuser werden weggekauft, andere Modelle setzten sich durch, niemand wird es kaufen und das Werbeteam verzeichnet keine Einnahmen.
  41. Will Video for Food » Eefoof Claims $3.85 per 1000 Views

    So, our ad revenue minus bandwidth expenses reached $1,393.38. That translates into about $3.85 per thousand hits. Revver, only pays out about 0.75 per thousand,12 haben mehr als $25 erhalten.
  42. In video shakeout, will Eefoof go poof? / While YouTube dominates Web of today, about 240 sites have dreams of success -- or getting gobbled up for big bucks

    Übersicht über den Videohostingmarkt mit der aussicht, dass 90% dicht machen werden. Außerdem viel über Dabble und die besonderen ausrichtungen der verschiedenen Unternehemen.
  43. Advertising Age - MediaWorks - YouTube Rival Revver's Killer App Is Its Ad Model

    Portät von Revver. 50/50 Split und 20/80 wenn ein Video auf fremden Seiten abgespielt wird die 80% werden dann 50/50 geteil. 1Frame werbung am schluss. Partner Microsoft, Universal Pictures, Warner, Mentos, (alle Mentos spots).Screening der INhalte
  44. How will YouTube make money?

    YouTube behauptete der Weg in die Profitabilität ist in Sichtweise und es wird keine Pro- oder Postroll Ads geben. Marketing Deals ja. 19.6 Mio Besucher im Juni. Es wird auch mit Displayadvertising experimentiert. Nicht alles ist top-
  45. Responses to "Is My Animated Short Worth a Penny"

    Animatoren reagieren auf das Problem, dass bei den Videohosting Seiten keine Einnahmen generiert werden. Die Seiten werden als Schaufenster verwendet und verhalten sich den Produzenten gegenüber nicht gerade Glücklich.
  46. WSJ.com - Making a Buck Off Your Pet-Trick Videos

    Portät einiger Revue Sharing Seiten im Internet. Die Seiten wollen sich differenzieren und User anlocken im härteren Konkurrenzkampf. Dabei gibt es eine vielzahl von Programmen, die dies ermöglichen, was auswirkungen auf die Produzenten hat.
  47. Will Video for Food » Any Theories on Why More Online-Video Sites Aren’t Sharing Revenue With Content Owners?

    5 Theorien warum nicht noch mehr Seiten Erlöse mit den Videoproduzenten teilen. Die Produzenten erwarten keine Erlösen, es gibt keine Erlöse oder der Markt fordert es nicht.
  48. Mayerson on Animation: The YouTube Purge and a Copyright Rant

    VIdeosharingseiten sollten eine Radioansatz unterliegen. Alles Senden aber dafür bezahlen nicht erst groß verhandeln. Damit könnten die User alles Posten was sie wollen und die Inhaber bekommen einen Teil. PD ist zu unhandlich.
  49. Will Video for Food » Making Money on Your Amateur Videos: Comparing Revenue-Sharing Websites

    Matrix mit den momentan bekannten Gewinnbeteiligungsseiten für Onlinevideos. Dabei kommt raus, dass es noch kein wirklich funktionierendes Modell gibt entweder keine Beteiligung oder kein Traffic oder beides.
  50. Is My Animated Short Worth a Penny?

    Der Erfolg auf Revver hat weniger als einen Penny pro Zuschauer generiert. Und auch alle anderen Seiten funktionieren nicht (Atomfilms). Die ganzen Filmemacher bekommen keine nennenswerte Beträge heraus. neue Modelle sind gefragt.

First / Previous / Next / Last / Page 1 of 2